Saturday, January 13, 2007

Conservative revelation

Some time ago, I wrote something about a powerful piece by a life-long conservative who had finally "seen the light". I have been pointed towards another such character today and I note that both times I received my tip from the invaluable Glenn Greenwald, who spends time reading the right-wing stuff so that we don't have to. This time he introduces Rod Dreher who is, in Glenn's words:
... as conservative as it gets -- a contributor to National Review and the Corner, a current columnist for The Dallas Morning News, a self-described "practicing Christian and political conservative."

Today, Dreher has an extraordinary (oral) essay at NPR in which he recounts how the conduct of President Bush (for whom he voted twice) in the Iraq War (which he supported) is causing him to question, really to abandon, the core political beliefs he has held since childhood.

Dreher, 40, recounts that his "first real political memory" was the 1979 failed rescue effort of the U.S. hostages in Iran. He says he "hated" Jimmy Carter for "shaming America before our enemies with weakness and incompetence." When Reagan was elected, he believed "America was saved." Reagan was "strong and confident." Democrats were "weak and depressed."

In particular, Dreher recounts how much, during the 1980s, he "disliked hippies - the blame America first liberals who were so hung up on Vietnam, who surrendered to Communists back then just like they want to do now." In short, Republicans were "winners." Democrats were "defeatists."

On 9/11, Dreher's first thought was : "Thank God we have a Republican in the White House." The rest of his essay:
As President Bush marched the country to war with Iraq, even some voices on the Right warned that this was a fool's errand. I dismissed them angrily. I thought them unpatriotic.

But almost four years later, I see that I was the fool.

In Iraq, this Republican President for whom I voted twice has shamed our country with weakness and incompetence, and the consequences of his failure will be far, far worse than anything Carter did.

The fraud, the mendacity, the utter haplessness of our government's conduct of the Iraq war have been shattering to me.

It wasn't supposed to turn out like this. Not under a Republican President.

I turn 40 next month -- middle aged at last -- a time of discovering limits, finitude. I expected that. But what I did not expect was to see the limits of finitude of American power revealed so painfully.

I did not expect Vietnam.

As I sat in my office last night watching President Bush deliver his big speech, I seethed over the waste, the folly, the stupidity of this war.

I had a heretical thought for a conservative - that I have got to teach my kids that they must never, ever take Presidents and Generals at their word - that their government will send them to kill and die for noble-sounding rot - that they have to question authority.

On the walk to the parking garage, it hit me. Hadn't the hippies tried to tell my generation that? Why had we scorned them so blithely?

Will my children, too small now to understand Iraq, take me seriously when I tell them one day what powerful men, whom their father once believed in, did to this country? Heavy thoughts for someone who is still a conservative despite it all. It was a long drive home.
Dreher's essay is extreme and intense but also increasingly commonplace and illustrative. The disaster of unparalleled magnitude that President Bush and his integrity-free and bloodthirsty administration and followers wrought on this country will have a profound impact not only on American strength and credibility for a long, long time to come, but also on the views of Americans towards their political leaders and, almost certainly, towards the Republican Party.

One of the very few potential benefits of the Iraq tragedy is that it may raise the level of doubt and cynicism with which Americans evaluate the claims of the Government when it tries -- as Dreher put it -- "to send them to kill and die for noble-sounding rot."


Blogger liberal journal man said...

This is excellent, Bill, and it highlights how there are millions who supported Bush and now realize that he was a liar, he had his own interests in mind, and the conservatives (and 'centrists') who followed him in lock step were criminal enablers.

I'm doubtful but hopeful that this will create a lasting change in how America votes for President in the future; that is, that the choice is between critical analysis of more liberal candidates versus the blind sabre rattling conservatives. I MUST cross-post this on my blog.

11:04 PM  
Blogger Bill said...

It certainly is a treat to see some conservatives finally "getting it" and I should just appreciate that fact but I can't help but ask: how could it have taken so long?

I once said to a friend that I would like to meet and talk with an intelligent, informed Bush supporter because I really wanted to try to understand what they could possibly see in him. My friend said that there is not such thing as "an intelligent, informed Bush supporter" It was an oxymoron -- one couldn't be intelligent and informed and still be a Bush supporter.

Sadly, when it comes to voting, there are an awful lot of not very intelligent, not very curious, not well-informed people out there. They won't be swayed by informed argument. Every time I see a poll result, I marvel -- how can there still be ~30% who support him?

12:51 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home