Thursday, February 23, 2006

It's started... again

The first shot over the bow in the latest attack on Roe v. Wade has been fired by South Dakota. Jane at FDL reports and fulminates on the fact that "South Dakota has now passed a law banning abortion with no exception for rape or incest [...] The law was passed, in large, because the way is now clear to a Supreme Court who might actually uphold it".

Read this powerful piece by ReddHedd entitled Try Standing in Someone Else's Shoes.

Life is ugly, messy and unfair. Last time I read my Bible, Christ asked his followers to do for the least of his bretheren as they would do for the highest of them.

Last I checked, rape and incest victims didn't ask for the violent, terrifying, horrible action taken against them. But clearly someone in South Dakota disagrees.

Shame on them. And shame on every single "pro-choice" politician who voted for cloture on Alito. Every woman in this nation is about to reap what those politicians so cavilierly have sown. Shame, shame, shame.


Digby calls it as he sees it:
As the country careens toward a supreme court showdown on Roe vs Wade, I just have to point out that columnists like EJ Dionne are full of shit when they say that most members of the right to life movement care more about a the taking of an innocent life rather than wanting to control a woman’s reproductive systems. They may think that’s what they care about but if that were true 81% of Americans, including many who call themselves "pro-life," wouldn't believe that abortion should be legal in case of rape or incest.

I hate to point out the obvious but children who are conceived in rape or incest are just as innocent as those who are conceived because birth control failed. The difference is not in the relative innocence of the children --- it’s the "innocence" of the woman. Most people believe that she should not be forced to bear the child of her molester, her relative or her rapist. And I think it’s fair to assume that they think this because they believe that the pregnancy wasn’t her “fault."

[...]

But let’s face it. Even if everyone had birth control, unwanted pregnancies would still happen. Nothing is foolproof. As the Republicans remind us incessantly, the only foolproof way to ensure there is no unwanted preganancy is abstinence. That's the real message of the "pro-life" movement. If women don't want to endure forced childbirth they shouldn't have sex. Period.


Jane is on the same page. She doesn't believe that the...

"forced childbirth forces actually "care" about the taking of innocent life [...] What they care about is punishing women for having sex".

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home